DLN vs. HIDV
DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) and HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DLN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index, while HIDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. DLN is passively managed, while HIDV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DLN returned 18.35%/yr vs 22.01%/yr for HIDV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DLN charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HIDV.
Performance
DLN vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLN achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than HIDV's 10.96% return.
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
HIDV
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 28.51%
- 3Y*
- 22.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLN vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 14.17% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 10.96% | 14.64% | 26.01% | 22.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLN and HIDV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DLN and HIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLN vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank
DLN
HIDV
DLN vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLN | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.69 | 2.99 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.59 | 13.04 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLN | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.41 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.62 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
DLN vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLN drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than HIDV's maximum drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLN and HIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLN | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.84% | -18.76% | -39.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -9.57% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.71% | -18.76% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.95% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -2.05% | -5.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.44% | 2.19% | -0.75% |
Volatility
DLN vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) is 2.17%, while AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that DLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLN | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 2.98% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.77% | 9.02% | -2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.87% | 11.91% | -3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 14.52% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 14.52% | +1.64% |
DLN vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLN has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DLN vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison
DLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than HIDV's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DLN and HIDV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIDV has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLN dropped -57.84% vs HIDV's -18.76%.
On 3-year performance, HIDV leads with 22.01% vs 18.35% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 22.01% return vs 18.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HIDV.
HIDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.79% for DLN.
DLN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HIDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DLN and 0.45% for HIDV.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLN and HIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer