PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLLL vs. NOWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLLL vs. NOWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 738.32% return, which is significantly higher than NOWL's -62.15% return.


DLLL

1D
-3.72%
1M
12.43%
6M
819.94%
YTD
738.32%
1Y
636.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NOWL

1D
6.48%
1M
14.11%
6M
-56.11%
YTD
-62.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLLL vs. NOWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DLLL
GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF
738.32%-10.56%
NOWL
GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF
-62.15%-43.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and NOWL is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLLL vs. NOWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLLL
DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

NOWL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLLL vs. NOWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLLLNOWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.48

DLLL vs. NOWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. NOWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, smaller than the maximum NOWL drawdown of -86.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and NOWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLLLNOWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.58%

-86.64%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.70%

-79.83%

+59.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.71%

-50.94%

+25.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.50%

Volatility

DLLL vs. NOWL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLLLNOWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

134.10%

104.54%

+29.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

129.72%

104.54%

+25.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

129.72%

104.54%

+25.18%

DLLL vs. NOWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DLLL and NOWL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

DLLL vs. NOWL - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLLL nor NOWL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DLLL and NOWL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DLLL and NOWL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

DLLL and NOWL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLLL and NOWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer