DLLL vs. CRMG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DLLL is passively managed, while CRMG is actively managed. Over the past year, DLLL returned 540.38% vs -65.86% for CRMG. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

DLLL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 589.77% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -64.33% return.

DLLL

• 1D: -10.21%
• 1M: -10.70%
• 6M: 667.04%
• YTD: 589.77%
• 1Y: 540.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: 6.77%
• 1M: 10.88%
• 6M: -53.43%
• YTD: -64.33%
• 1Y: -65.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLLL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	589.77%	118.90%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-64.33%	-0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and CRMG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.14

The correlation between DLLL and CRMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DLLL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLLL

DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 94
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 93

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLLL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLLL	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.00	-0.85	+4.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	-1.33	+5.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	0.85	+0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.53	-0.87	+10.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.00	-1.45	+20.45

DLLL vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLLL Sharpe Ratio is 4.00, which is higher than the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLLL and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLLL	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.58%	-79.83%	+11.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.19%	-75.82%	+18.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.75%	-73.90%	+39.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.70%	-41.04%	+15.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.64%	45.39%	-16.75%

Volatility

DLLL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a higher volatility of 43.56% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) at 23.42%. This indicates that DLLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLLL	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	43.56%	23.42%	+20.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	110.12%	64.24%	+45.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	136.53%	77.97%	+58.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	131.16%	75.77%	+55.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	131.16%	75.77%	+55.39%

DLLL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLLL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLLL nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLLL and CRMG in my portfolio?

DLLL and CRMG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLLL or CRMG?

DLLL has higher volatility (43.56%) compared to CRMG (23.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLLL dropped -68.58% vs CRMG's -79.83%.

Which ETF is better, DLLL or CRMG?

On 1-year performance, DLLL leads with 540.38% vs -65.86% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CRMG has been the lower-risk option at 23.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DLLL or CRMG?

Over the 1-year period, DLLL has performed better with a 540.38% return vs -65.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLLL or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLLL or CRMG?

DLLL and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DLLL and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 0.75% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.