DLLL vs. BMNG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DLLL is passively managed, while BMNG is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DLLL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.

Performance

DLLL vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 757.76% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -75.13% return.

DLLL

• 1D: -6.45%
• 1M: 245.92%
• YTD: 757.76%
• 6M: 648.38%
• 1Y: 850.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: -12.21%
• 1M: -48.30%
• YTD: -75.13%
• 6M: -85.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLLL vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF	757.76%	-42.74%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-75.13%	-81.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DLLL and BMNG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

DLLL vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLLL

DLLL Risk / Return Rank: 95
DLLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DLLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
DLLL Omega Ratio Rank: 91
DLLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
DLLL Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLLL vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DLLL	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.65	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	31.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DLLL	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.16	-0.52	+3.68

Drawdowns

DLLL vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLLL	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.58%	-95.36%	+26.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.86%	-95.36%	+76.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.91%	-81.38%	+55.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DLLL	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	69.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.28%	191.58%	-62.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	130.55%	191.58%	-61.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	130.55%	191.58%	-61.03%

DLLL vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLLL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLLL vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither DLLL nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLLL and BMNG in my portfolio?

DLLL and BMNG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DLLL or BMNG?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DLLL or BMNG?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DLLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DLLL or BMNG?

DLLL and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DLLL and BMNG?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DLLL and 0.75% for BMNG.