DLENX vs. PYCEX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX).
DLENX is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010. PYCEX is managed by Paydenfunds. It was launched on Nov 10, 2013.
Performance
DLENX vs. PYCEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DLENX vs. PYCEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | -1.36% | 8.11% | 7.92% | 9.36% | -15.50% | 1.71% | 4.66% | 11.71% | -3.54% | 8.31% |
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | -0.54% | 7.96% | 7.90% | 7.37% | -11.02% | 0.80% | 8.17% | 11.90% | -3.33% | 9.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLENX achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly lower than PYCEX's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, DLENX has underperformed PYCEX with an annualized return of 3.75%, while PYCEX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.20% annualized return.
DLENX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
PYCEX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DLENX vs. PYCEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLENX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PYCEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DLENX vs. PYCEX — Risk / Return Rank
DLENX
PYCEX
DLENX vs. PYCEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLENX | PYCEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 1.96 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 2.54 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.49 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.71 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.96 | 7.05 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLENX | PYCEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.96 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.75 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 1.18 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.19 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between DLENX and PYCEX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DLENX vs. PYCEX - Dividend Comparison
DLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than PYCEX's 6.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | 4.90% | 5.33% | 5.71% | 5.29% | 4.49% | 3.74% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 4.29% | 4.94% |
PYCEX Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 6.43% | 6.50% | 6.21% | 5.59% | 4.92% | 5.23% | 4.00% | 4.81% | 5.13% | 4.84% | 4.18% | 4.51% |
Drawdowns
DLENX vs. PYCEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLENX drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than PYCEX's maximum drawdown of -20.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLENX and PYCEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLENX | PYCEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -20.12% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.96% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | -20.12% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.64% | -20.12% | -5.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -2.08% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -3.04% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 0.72% | -0.07% |
Volatility
DLENX vs. PYCEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) is 0.67%, while Payden Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PYCEX) has a volatility of 0.84%. This indicates that DLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYCEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DLENX | PYCEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.84% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.39% | 1.42% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 2.59% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.57% | 3.21% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 3.57% | +1.09% |