DLENX vs. PACEX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX).
DLENX is an actively managed fund by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2010. PACEX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 23, 2012.
Performance
DLENX vs. PACEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DLENX vs. PACEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | -1.03% | 8.11% | 7.92% | 9.36% | -15.50% | 1.71% | 4.66% | 11.71% | -3.54% | 8.31% |
PACEX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | -1.68% | 8.38% | 6.64% | 6.38% | -13.41% | -2.01% | 6.59% | 12.82% | -1.80% | 8.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLENX achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly higher than PACEX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, DLENX has outperformed PACEX with an annualized return of 3.78%, while PACEX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.41% annualized return.
DLENX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 1.65%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
PACEX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DLENX vs. PACEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLENX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PACEX's 1.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DLENX vs. PACEX — Risk / Return Rank
DLENX
PACEX
DLENX vs. PACEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLENX | PACEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.47 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.02 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 1.40 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.64 | 5.25 | +1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLENX | PACEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.47 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.22 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.84 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.94 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between DLENX and PACEX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DLENX vs. PACEX - Dividend Comparison
DLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than PACEX's 5.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLENX DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N | 4.88% | 5.33% | 5.71% | 5.29% | 4.49% | 3.74% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 4.29% | 4.94% |
PACEX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.19% | 5.50% | 4.76% | 3.86% | 3.06% | 3.36% | 3.85% | 4.26% | 4.46% | 3.94% | 4.27% | 4.92% |
Drawdowns
DLENX vs. PACEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLENX drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than PACEX's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLENX and PACEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLENX | PACEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -23.40% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -3.35% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | -23.40% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.64% | -23.40% | -2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -3.07% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -4.20% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 0.89% | -0.25% |
Volatility
DLENX vs. PACEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) is 0.64%, while T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that DLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PACEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DLENX | PACEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 0.88% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 1.86% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59% | 3.20% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.56% | 3.44% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 4.06% | +0.60% |