PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLENX vs. EMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLENX vs. EMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLENX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly lower than EMCIX's 2.88% return. Over the past 10 years, DLENX has outperformed EMCIX with an annualized return of 3.19%, while EMCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.


DLENX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.55%
6M
0.17%
YTD
0.87%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
7.13%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
3.19%
ALL TIME*
3.97%

EMCIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.15%
6M
1.37%
YTD
2.88%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
-1.45%
10Y*
2.20%
ALL TIME*
0.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DLENX vs. EMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
0.87%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%
EMCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund
2.88%8.81%8.28%6.01%-22.35%-6.47%7.34%11.08%-3.92%13.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DLENX and EMCIX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between DLENX and EMCIX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLENX vs. EMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

EMCIX
EMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DLENX vs. EMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLENXEMCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.90

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

7.39

+0.05

DLENX vs. EMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLENX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the EMCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLENX and EMCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLENX vs. EMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLENX drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum EMCIX drawdown of -36.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLENX and EMCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLENXEMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-36.20%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.83%

-3.10%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

-4.02%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-35.82%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.64%

-36.20%

+10.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-8.53%

+7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-13.52%

+9.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.79%

-0.30%

Volatility

DLENX vs. EMCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) is 0.56%, while Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund (EMCIX) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that DLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLENXEMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

1.69%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.55%

2.61%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98%

5.63%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

5.72%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.64%

6.07%

-1.43%

DLENX vs. EMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLENX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCIX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLENX vs. EMCIX - Dividend Comparison

DLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than EMCIX's 9.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
4.86%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
EMCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund
9.59%7.69%4.92%5.23%6.67%4.28%5.13%6.62%6.62%4.89%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLENX and EMCIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMCIX has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to DLENX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLENX dropped -25.64% vs EMCIX's -36.20%.

DLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLENX and EMCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer