DLDRX vs. CGIAX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DLDRX (BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund) and CGIAX (American Funds International Growth and Income Fund) are both mutual funds - DLDRX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Dreyfus, while CGIAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, DLDRX returned 12.44%/yr vs 9.41%/yr for CGIAX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DLDRX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for CGIAX.

Performance

DLDRX vs. CGIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLDRX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than CGIAX's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, DLDRX has outperformed CGIAX with an annualized return of 12.44%, while CGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.41% annualized return.

DLDRX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -5.75%
• 6M: 9.06%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 1Y: 29.63%
• 3Y*: 10.85%
• 5Y*: 15.62%
• 10Y*: 12.44%

CGIAX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.81%
• 6M: 7.08%
• YTD: 11.33%
• 1Y: 23.54%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 8.63%
• 10Y*: 9.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLDRX vs. CGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund	16.16%	15.04%	0.81%	1.58%	34.18%	38.30%	6.58%	16.64%	-17.57%	14.05%
CGIAX American Funds International Growth and Income Fund	11.33%	35.04%	3.26%	15.22%	-15.49%	9.79%	7.73%	27.06%	-14.45%	26.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DLDRX and CGIAX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2008	0.73

The correlation between DLDRX and CGIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DLDRX vs. CGIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLDRX

DLDRX Risk / Return Rank: 52
DLDRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
DLDRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DLDRX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DLDRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DLDRX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CGIAX

CGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 51
CGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
CGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLDRX vs. CGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DLDRX	CGIAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.63	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.31	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	2.11	+0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.56	7.81	+0.75

DLDRX vs. CGIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLDRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the CGIAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLDRX and CGIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DLDRX vs. CGIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLDRX drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than CGIAX's maximum drawdown of -35.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLDRX and CGIAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DLDRX	CGIAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.13%	-35.78%	-33.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.26%	-10.90%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.44%	-12.58%	-19.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.44%	-29.93%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.24%	-35.78%	-18.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.09%	-2.05%	-7.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.71%	-7.90%	-12.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	2.95%	+0.50%

Volatility

DLDRX vs. CGIAX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund (DLDRX) and American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) have volatilities of 5.08% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DLDRX	CGIAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	4.91%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.19%	12.31%	+1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.82%	14.16%	+4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.59%	14.78%	+10.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.46%	15.72%	+9.74%

DLDRX vs. CGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLDRX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than CGIAX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

DLDRX vs. CGIAX - Dividend Comparison

DLDRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than CGIAX's 6.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGIAX American Funds International Growth and Income Fund	6.94%	8.13%	3.34%	2.27%	3.99%	6.90%	1.35%	2.36%	2.74%	1.80%	2.29%	3.17%
DLDRX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund	2.01%	2.33%	7.45%	12.42%	9.66%	5.07%	1.11%	2.16%	1.87%	0.63%	1.44%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DLDRX and CGIAX in my portfolio?

DLDRX and CGIAX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DLDRX or CGIAX?

DLDRX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to CGIAX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLDRX dropped -69.13% vs CGIAX's -35.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.