DLDFX vs. FCFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund (DLDFX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX).
DLDFX is managed by Destinations Funds. It was launched on Mar 20, 2017. FCFAX is managed by Frost Funds. It was launched on Dec 3, 2012.
Performance
DLDFX vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DLDFX vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLDFX Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund | 1.24% | 4.91% | 6.09% | 7.11% | -2.59% | 5.41% | 1.52% | 1.16% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | -0.70% | 5.21% | 8.01% | 11.23% | -7.83% | 5.07% | 6.22% | 2.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLDFX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than FCFAX's -0.70% return.
DLDFX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
FCFAX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DLDFX vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DLDFX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DLDFX vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank
DLDFX
FCFAX
DLDFX vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund (DLDFX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DLDFX | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.11 | 1.21 | +1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.29 | 1.69 | +3.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.99 | 1.24 | +0.75 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 1.41 | +2.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.98 | 5.32 | +17.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DLDFX | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | 1.21 | +1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.20 | 1.36 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.73 | 1.41 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between DLDFX and FCFAX is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DLDFX vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison
DLDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than FCFAX's 5.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLDFX Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund | 5.50% | 5.29% | 5.64% | 4.77% | 4.54% | 3.74% | 3.86% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 5.61% | 6.10% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.69% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 5.85% | 4.84% | 4.95% |
Drawdowns
DLDFX vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLDFX drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum FCFAX drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLDFX and FCFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLDFX | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -16.33% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.08% | -2.34% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.88% | -10.49% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -2.03% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.72% | -1.54% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.62% | -0.37% |
Volatility
DLDFX vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Destinations Low Duration Fixed Income Fund (DLDFX) is 0.47%, while Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that DLDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DLDFX | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 1.02% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | 1.55% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 2.63% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.79% | 2.73% | -0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.09% | 3.24% | -1.15% |