PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLCG.TO vs. ADMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dominion Lending Centres Inc. (DLCG.TO) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DLCG.TO is traded in CAD, while ADMA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ADMA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLCG.TO achieves a -13.26% return, which is significantly higher than ADMA's -56.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DLCG.TO has outperformed ADMA with an annualized return of 6.25%, while ADMA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.09% annualized return.


DLCG.TO

1D
1.55%
1M
-9.67%
YTD
-13.26%
6M
-11.30%
1Y
-8.17%
3Y*
58.57%
5Y*
20.20%
10Y*
6.25%

ADMA

1D
2.52%
1M
-23.23%
YTD
-56.91%
6M
-60.80%
1Y
-61.58%
3Y*
25.65%
5Y*
38.71%
10Y*
1.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLCG.TO
Dominion Lending Centres Inc.
-13.26%29.71%187.28%-8.13%-12.34%22.15%136.15%4.00%-45.11%-38.57%
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
-56.91%1.48%312.02%13.93%194.79%-28.35%-52.07%59.14%-19.23%-41.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DLCG.TO and ADMA is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DLCG.TO:

CA$663.87M

ADMA:

$1.86B

EPS

DLCG.TO:

CA$0.28

ADMA:

$0.68

PE Ratio

DLCG.TO:

30.16

ADMA:

11.46

PS Ratio

DLCG.TO:

7.15

ADMA:

3.72

PB Ratio

DLCG.TO:

4.90

ADMA:

4.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

DLCG.TO:

CA$97.50M

ADMA:

$509.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DLCG.TO:

CA$83.85M

ADMA:

$312.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

DLCG.TO:

CA$42.41M

ADMA:

$218.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLCG.TO
DLCG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DLCG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLCG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLCG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DLCG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLCG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ADMA
ADMA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ADMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADMA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ADMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADMA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dominion Lending Centres Inc. (DLCG.TO) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DLCG.TOADMADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.23

-1.14

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.12

-1.82

+1.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.76

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

-0.95

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.65

-1.90

+1.25

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLCG.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is higher than the ADMA Sharpe Ratio of -1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLCG.TO and ADMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DLCG.TOADMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

-1.14

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.66

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.02

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.03

+0.04

Drawdowns

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLCG.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.79%, which is greater than ADMA's maximum drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLCG.TO and ADMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLCG.TOADMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.79%

-90.48%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.19%

-64.81%

+36.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.19%

-68.97%

+40.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.19%

-68.97%

+11.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.29%

-86.72%

-0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.21%

-68.18%

+46.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.06%

-48.98%

-13.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.62%

32.40%

-19.78%

Volatility

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dominion Lending Centres Inc. (DLCG.TO) is 11.63%, while ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that DLCG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ADMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLCG.TOADMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.63%

20.21%

-8.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.54%

44.96%

-16.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.71%

54.17%

-18.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.29%

59.18%

-9.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.69%

68.89%

-8.20%

Dividends

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Dividend Comparison

DLCG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while ADMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DLCG.TO
Dominion Lending Centres Inc.
1.99%1.51%1.54%4.29%2.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.16%2.21%0.00%116.00%

Financials

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dominion Lending Centres Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M20222023202420252026
19.95M
114.49M
(DLCG.TO) Total Revenue
(ADMA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DLCG.TO values in CAD, ADMA values in USD

DLCG.TO vs. ADMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dominion Lending Centres Inc. and ADMA Biologics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
81.8%
70.5%
Portfolio components
DLCG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dominion Lending Centres Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.32M and revenue of 19.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.8%.

ADMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.75M and revenue of 114.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.

DLCG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dominion Lending Centres Inc. reported an operating income of 7.15M and revenue of 19.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.8%.

ADMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.27M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

DLCG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dominion Lending Centres Inc. reported a net income of 4.80M and revenue of 19.95M, resulting in a net margin of 24.1%.

ADMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 45.33M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DLCG.TO and ADMA have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLCG.TO and ADMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer