PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLCFX vs. FLCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DLCFX vs. FLCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund (DLCFX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLCFX achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than FLCKX's 27.04% return.


DLCFX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
5.20%
6M
4.12%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*

FLCKX

1D
1.44%
1M
9.27%
YTD
27.04%
6M
25.37%
1Y
44.85%
3Y*
29.90%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
16.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLCFX vs. FLCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLCFX
Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund
5.20%14.72%20.72%24.88%-18.90%20.57%21.14%28.72%-6.04%14.37%
FLCKX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K
27.04%20.45%27.06%26.21%-22.91%26.19%26.85%35.76%-16.34%12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DLCFX and FLCKX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.91

The correlation between DLCFX and FLCKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLCFX vs. FLCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLCFX
DLCFX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
DLCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DLCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCKX
FLCKX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FLCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLCFX vs. FLCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund (DLCFX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLCFXFLCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.59

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

13.05

-5.33

DLCFX vs. FLCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the FLCKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLCFX and FLCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLCFX vs. FLCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLCFX drawdown since its inception was -34.88%, smaller than the maximum FLCKX drawdown of -69.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLCFX and FLCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLCFXFLCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.88%

-69.99%

+35.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.83%

-13.03%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

-28.52%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.94%

-28.52%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

0.00%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-12.39%

+6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

3.57%

-1.16%

Volatility

DLCFX vs. FLCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund (DLCFX) is 4.44%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K (FLCKX) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that DLCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLCFXFLCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

9.06%

-4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

18.28%

-8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

22.29%

-10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

23.09%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.18%

23.52%

-3.34%

DLCFX vs. FLCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DLCFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DLCFX vs. FLCKX - Dividend Comparison

DLCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than FLCKX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLCFX
Destinations Large Cap Equity Fund
6.90%7.26%15.20%4.70%5.64%17.51%1.92%1.79%3.76%0.67%0.00%0.00%
FLCKX
Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund Class K
3.69%4.69%14.54%12.22%18.51%8.45%0.19%0.14%19.95%18.97%27.57%6.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DLCFX and FLCKX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCKX has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to DLCFX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLCFX dropped -34.88% vs FLCKX's -69.99%.

FLCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLCFX and FLCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer