PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DLB vs. ITT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DLB vs. ITT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and ITT Inc. (ITT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DLB achieves a -17.26% return, which is significantly lower than ITT's 9.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DLB has underperformed ITT with an annualized return of 2.40%, while ITT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.85% annualized return.


DLB

1D
-0.40%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
-17.26%
6M
-21.32%
1Y
-27.49%
3Y*
-13.16%
5Y*
-10.74%
10Y*
2.40%

ITT

1D
2.23%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.25%
1Y
26.71%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
16.50%
10Y*
19.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DLB vs. ITT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
-17.26%-16.27%-7.95%23.82%-24.90%-0.99%42.99%12.63%0.78%38.73%
ITT
ITT Inc.
9.44%22.52%20.86%48.91%-19.50%33.95%5.47%54.60%-8.66%40.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DLB and ITT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2005

0.44

The correlation between DLB and ITT shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DLB:

$5.02B

ITT:

$16.61B

EPS

DLB:

$2.53

ITT:

$5.58

PE Ratio

DLB:

20.79

ITT:

33.91

PEG Ratio

DLB:

30.68

ITT:

2.38

PS Ratio

DLB:

3.71

ITT:

3.66

PB Ratio

DLB:

1.92

ITT:

3.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

DLB:

$1.36B

ITT:

$4.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DLB:

$1.19B

ITT:

$1.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

DLB:

$347.35M

ITT:

$793.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DLB vs. ITT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DLB
DLB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
DLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLB Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ITT
ITT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ITT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ITT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DLB vs. ITT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) and ITT Inc. (ITT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DLBITTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.18

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

1.52

-2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.93

3.88

-5.82

DLB vs. ITT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DLB Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the ITT Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DLB and ITT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DLB vs. ITT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DLB drawdown since its inception was -62.19%, smaller than the maximum ITT drawdown of -74.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLB and ITT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DLBITTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.19%

-74.46%

+12.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.11%

-16.73%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.92%

-29.09%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.41%

-37.97%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.04%

-49.52%

+4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.04%

-14.51%

-30.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.37%

-18.95%

-3.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.84%

6.54%

+8.30%

Volatility

DLB vs. ITT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) is 6.02%, while ITT Inc. (ITT) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that DLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DLBITTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

9.01%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.37%

22.19%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.14%

30.02%

-4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.03%

29.22%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.61%

31.92%

-5.31%

Dividends

DLB vs. ITT - Dividend Comparison

DLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than ITT's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
2.68%2.10%1.57%1.29%1.45%0.96%0.91%1.15%1.08%0.94%1.11%1.25%
ITT
ITT Inc.
0.78%0.81%0.89%0.97%1.30%0.86%0.88%0.80%1.11%0.96%1.29%1.30%

Financials

DLB vs. ITT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and ITT Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
395.63M
1.21B
(DLB) Total Revenue
(ITT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DLB vs. ITT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and ITT Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
88.7%
35.4%
Portfolio components
DLB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported a gross profit of 350.90M and revenue of 395.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.7%.

ITT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a gross profit of 428.80M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.4%.

DLB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.95M and revenue of 395.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.

ITT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported an operating income of 141.20M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

DLB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. reported a net income of 94.92M and revenue of 395.63M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.

ITT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ITT Inc. reported a net income of 78.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DLB and ITT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITT has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to DLB (6.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLB dropped -62.19% vs ITT's -74.46%.

ITT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DLB and ITT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer