DJUL vs. LAPR
DJUL (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July) and LAPR (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. DJUL is passively managed, while LAPR is actively managed. Over the past year, DJUL returned 16.12% vs 7.01% for LAPR. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DJUL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LAPR.
Performance
DJUL vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJUL achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than LAPR's 3.32% return.
DJUL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
LAPR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 7.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJUL vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July | 4.89% | 13.31% | 8.62% |
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April | 3.32% | 5.81% | 4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJUL and LAPR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DJUL and LAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJUL vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank
DJUL
LAPR
DJUL vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJUL | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 2.93 | -1.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 29.36 | -25.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.56 | 144.96 | -124.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJUL | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 5.58 | -2.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 1.97 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
DJUL vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJUL drawdown since its inception was -12.54%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJUL and LAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJUL | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -3.81% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.25% | -0.24% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.99% | -0.11% | -1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.05% | +0.74% |
Volatility
DJUL vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July (DJUL) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.32%. This indicates that DJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJUL | LAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 0.32% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 1.00% | +3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.64% | 1.27% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.39% | 3.30% | +5.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 3.30% | +4.64% |
DJUL vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJUL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJUL vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison
DJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DJUL FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April | 5.53% | 5.40% | 4.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DJUL and LAPR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DJUL has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJUL dropped -12.54% vs LAPR's -3.81%.
On 1-year performance, DJUL leads with 16.12% vs 7.01% for LAPR. On fees, LAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DJUL has performed better with a 16.12% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUL.
LAPR has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 0.00% for DJUL.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DJUL and 0.79% for LAPR.
LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DJUL and LAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer