PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJTU vs. INTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJTU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJTU achieves a -72.52% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.


DJTU

1D
-8.86%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-72.52%
6M
-77.26%
1Y
-90.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INTW

1D
10.59%
1M
28.23%
YTD
871.59%
6M
897.00%
1Y
2,279.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJTU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DJTU
T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF
-72.52%-82.18%
INTW
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF
871.59%77.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DJTU and INTW is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJTU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJTU
DJTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DJTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DJTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJTU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

INTW
INTW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJTU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJTUINTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.68

-0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

46.81

-47.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

106.28

-107.64

DJTU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 15.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJTU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJTU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJTU drawdown since its inception was -96.27%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJTU and INTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJTUINTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.27%

-60.58%

-35.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.19%

-49.34%

-42.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.01%

0.00%

-96.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.24%

-29.71%

-38.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.24%

21.69%

+44.55%

Volatility

DJTU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long DJT Daily Target ETF (DJTU) is 39.84%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 53.88%. This indicates that DJTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJTUINTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.84%

53.88%

-14.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

107.65%

118.13%

-10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

135.21%

149.77%

-14.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.06%

148.63%

-7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.06%

148.63%

-7.57%

DJTU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJTU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither DJTU nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DJTU and INTW have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTW has higher volatility (53.88%) compared to DJTU (39.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJTU dropped -96.27% vs INTW's -60.58%.

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 2279.34% vs -90.11% for DJTU. On fees, DJTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, DJTU has been the lower-risk option at 39.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 2279.34% return vs -90.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

DJTU and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for DJTU and 1.50% for INTW.

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.45 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJTU and INTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer