PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF (DJSC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJSC.AS achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.AS's 21.89% return. Over the past 10 years, DJSC.AS has underperformed CNDX.AS with an annualized return of 8.71%, while CNDX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 21.38% annualized return.


DJSC.AS

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.65%
YTD
9.46%
6M
12.92%
1Y
19.20%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
8.71%

CNDX.AS

1D
0.15%
1M
11.52%
YTD
21.89%
6M
20.33%
1Y
38.95%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
18.85%
10Y*
21.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJSC.AS
iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF
9.46%21.43%-2.89%12.25%-14.19%21.56%8.54%25.52%-12.83%22.19%
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
21.89%6.16%35.29%50.41%-29.90%38.80%35.83%40.51%4.53%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DJSC.AS and CNDX.AS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2011

0.56

The correlation between DJSC.AS and CNDX.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJSC.AS
DJSC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DJSC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJSC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJSC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DJSC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJSC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CNDX.AS
CNDX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF (DJSC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJSC.ASCNDX.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.44

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

3.82

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

11.35

-5.03

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJSC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJSC.AS and CNDX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJSC.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.49

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.94

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

1.07

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.03

-0.66

Drawdowns

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJSC.AS drawdown since its inception was -63.04%, which is greater than CNDX.AS's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJSC.AS and CNDX.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJSC.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.04%

-31.21%

-31.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-10.06%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.05%

-26.57%

+10.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.17%

-31.21%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-31.21%

-4.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

0.00%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.33%

-5.45%

-7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.40%

-0.39%

Volatility

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison

iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF (DJSC.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJSC.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.25%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

10.70%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

15.52%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

19.73%

-3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.35%

19.61%

-3.26%

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJSC.AS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJSC.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison

DJSC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, while CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DJSC.AS
iShares EURO STOXX Small UCITS ETF
2.40%3.00%2.66%2.24%2.22%1.48%1.20%2.01%2.48%1.81%2.10%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJSC.AS and CNDX.AS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNDX.AS is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNDX.AS is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DJSC.AS.

DJSC.AS is categorized as Europe Equities, while CNDX.AS is Nasdaq-100. DJSC.AS tracks MSCI EMU SMID NR EUR, while CNDX.AS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DJSC.AS and 0.36% for CNDX.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJSC.AS and CNDX.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer