PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJIA vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJIA vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJIA achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return.


DJIA

1D
0.00%
1M
3.03%
YTD
3.46%
6M
3.90%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
-2.71%
1M
-9.80%
YTD
85.31%
6M
79.66%
1Y
88.71%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
23.48%
10Y*
13.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJIA vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
3.46%9.11%14.52%9.15%-2.80%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
85.31%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DJIA and BNO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.01

The correlation between DJIA and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJIA vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJIA
DJIA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DJIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJIA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DJIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJIA Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJIA vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJIABNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.99

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

9.39

-2.14

DJIA vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJIA and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJIABNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

2.15

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.14

+0.55

Drawdowns

DJIA vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJIA drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJIA and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJIABNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-87.06%

+70.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-17.87%

+10.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-23.75%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-12.72%

+12.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.59%

-40.16%

+36.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

9.48%

-7.51%

Volatility

DJIA vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF (DJIA) is 1.66%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that DJIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJIABNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

14.12%

-12.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

36.21%

-29.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.74%

41.56%

-33.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

35.40%

-24.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

36.69%

-25.50%

DJIA vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJIA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

DJIA vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

DJIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DJIA
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
10.82%10.60%11.44%7.16%9.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJIA and BNO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to DJIA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJIA dropped -16.91% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 26.74% vs 10.45% for DJIA. On fees, DJIA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DJIA has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 26.74% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJIA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

DJIA has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

DJIA is categorized as Derivative Income, while BNO is Oil & Gas. DJIA tracks DJIA Cboe BuyWrite v2 Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DJIA and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJIA and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer