PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJD vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJD vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJD achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.37% return. Over the past 10 years, DJD has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 12.49%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.


DJD

1D
0.46%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.48%
6M
12.09%
1Y
25.31%
3Y*
18.07%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
12.49%

MTUM

1D
2.87%
1M
14.36%
YTD
30.37%
6M
31.51%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
34.28%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJD vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJD
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF
11.48%15.83%13.66%9.41%-0.73%22.40%0.87%22.00%0.03%21.65%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
30.37%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DJD and MTUM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2015

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between DJD and MTUM has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DJD vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DJD
MTUM

Healthcare

19.9%
6.9%

Financial Services

14.7%
10.4%

Technology

13.3%
44.4%

Communication Services

12.5%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
3.3%

Industrials

8.4%
15.6%

Energy

7.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Healthcare

DJD
19.9%
MTUM
6.9%

Financial Services

DJD
14.7%
MTUM
10.4%

Technology

DJD
13.3%
MTUM
44.4%

Communication Services

DJD
12.5%
MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DJD
11.7%
MTUM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

DJD
10.8%
MTUM
3.3%

Industrials

DJD
8.4%
MTUM
15.6%

Energy

DJD
7.1%
MTUM
3.5%

Basic Materials

DJD
1.6%
MTUM
1.7%

Real Estate

DJD

-

MTUM
1.8%

Utilities

DJD

-

MTUM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJD vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJD
DJD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DJD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DJD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJD vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DJDMTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.15

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

2.92

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

3.63

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.27

14.50

-1.24

DJD vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJD Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJD and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DJDMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.15

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.74

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.82

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.84

-0.10

Drawdowns

DJD vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJD drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, roughly equal to the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJD and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJDMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.66%

-34.08%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-11.54%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.28%

-20.99%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.94%

-32.28%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-34.08%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-6.21%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.89%

-0.98%

Volatility

DJD vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) is 2.59%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that DJD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJDMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

7.73%

-5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

16.49%

-8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.20%

19.03%

-8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.35%

20.59%

-7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

21.04%

-4.39%

DJD vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DJD vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

DJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJD
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF
2.41%2.62%3.00%3.49%3.16%2.82%3.47%2.80%2.66%2.75%2.46%0.08%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJD and MTUM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to DJD (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJD dropped -34.66% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.19% vs 12.49% for DJD. On fees, DJD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DJD has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.19% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MTUM.

DJD has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

DJD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. DJD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Yield Weight, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for DJD and 0.15% for MTUM.

DJD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJD and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer