PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DJD vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DJD vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJD achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 16.60% return. Over the past 10 years, DJD has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.04% annualized return.


DJD

1D
0.25%
1M
1.76%
6M
11.60%
YTD
14.41%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
12.27%

FNDX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.96%
6M
12.91%
YTD
16.60%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
13.66%
10Y*
14.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJD vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DJD
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF
14.41%15.83%13.66%9.41%-0.73%22.40%0.87%22.00%0.03%21.65%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
16.60%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DJD and FNDX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2015

0.83

The correlation between DJD and FNDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DJD vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DJD
FNDX

Healthcare

23.8%
11.9%

Financial Services

17.0%
13.3%

Technology

16.6%
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

11.4%
7.0%

Industrials

7.8%
9.1%

Energy

6.5%
9.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
9.9%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Healthcare

DJD
23.8%
FNDX
11.9%

Financial Services

DJD
17.0%
FNDX
13.3%

Technology

DJD
16.6%
FNDX
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DJD
12.3%
FNDX
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

DJD
11.4%
FNDX
7.0%

Industrials

DJD
7.8%
FNDX
9.1%

Energy

DJD
6.5%
FNDX
9.3%

Communication Services

DJD
2.6%
FNDX
9.9%

Basic Materials

DJD
1.9%
FNDX
3.6%

Real Estate

DJD

-

FNDX
1.7%

Utilities

DJD

-

FNDX
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DJD vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DJD
DJD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DJD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
DJD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJD vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DJDFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.72

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

18.25

-5.77

DJD vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DJD Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DJD and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DJD vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJD drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJD and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DJDFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.66%

-37.72%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-6.06%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.28%

-16.30%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.94%

-19.06%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-37.72%

+3.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

0.00%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-3.54%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.56%

+0.34%

Volatility

DJD vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.59%. This indicates that DJD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DJDFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.59%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

7.42%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

10.33%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

15.13%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

17.44%

-0.88%

DJD vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DJD vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

DJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than FNDX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJD
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF
2.43%2.62%3.00%3.49%3.16%2.82%3.47%2.80%2.66%2.75%2.46%0.08%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.46%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DJD and FNDX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJD has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to FNDX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DJD dropped -34.66% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.04% vs 12.27% for DJD. On fees, DJD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DJD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

DJD has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.46% for FNDX.

DJD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Yield Weighted Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for DJD and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJD and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer