DJD vs. BUFH
DJD (Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DJD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Yield Weight, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DJD charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
DJD vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DJD achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.49% return.
DJD
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 25.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
BUFH
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJD vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DJD Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF | 11.48% | 11.47% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.49% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between DJD and BUFH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DJD vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
DJD
BUFH
DJD vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF (DJD) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DJD | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.76 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DJD | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 2.94 | -2.19 |
Drawdowns
DJD vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DJD drawdown since its inception was -34.66%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJD and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DJD | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.66% | -1.53% | -33.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -0.18% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | — | — |
Volatility
DJD vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DJD | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.20% | 2.37% | +7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 2.37% | +10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 2.37% | +14.28% |
DJD vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DJD has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DJD vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
DJD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DJD Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend ETF | 2.41% | 2.62% | 3.00% | 3.49% | 3.16% | 2.82% | 3.47% | 2.80% | 2.66% | 2.75% | 2.46% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DJD and BUFH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DJD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DJD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
DJD has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
DJD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for DJD and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for DJD and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer