PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DJAD.DE (Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist) and CEMC.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - DJAD.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while CEMC.DE is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DJAD.DE charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CEMC.DE.

Performance

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist (DJAD.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DJAD.DE achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than CEMC.DE's -1.27% return.

DJAD.DE

1D
0.26%
1M
1.26%
YTD
0.70%
6M
-0.72%
1Y
2.28%
3Y*
-3.33%
5Y*
-4.32%
10Y*
—

CEMC.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-1.27%
6M
-1.65%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
DJAD.DE
Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist		0.70%2.86%
CEMC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)		-1.27%2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between DJAD.DE and CEMC.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist

iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)

Often compared with DJAD.DE:
DJAD.DE vs. UEFI.DEDJAD.DE vs. VAGT.DEDJAD.DE vs. OM3M.DEDJAD.DE vs. VUDP.FDJAD.DE vs. PRAS.DEDJAD.DE vs. CEMF.DEDJAD.DE vs. VX6F.DE
Often compared with CEMC.DE:
CEMC.DE vs. DTLE.LCEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DECEMC.DE vs. IS3N.DECEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DECEMC.DE vs. EUNL.DECEMC.DE vs. IUSQ.DECEMC.DE vs. EUNA.DE

Return for Risk

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DJAD.DE
DJAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DJAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DJAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
CEMC.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist (DJAD.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

DJAD.DECEMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.26

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.43

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

DJAD.DECEMC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.12

-0.19

Drawdowns

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DJAD.DE drawdown since its inception was -44.43%, which is greater than CEMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DJAD.DE and CEMC.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DJAD.DECEMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.43%

-6.93%

-37.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.37%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.67%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.54%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.73%

-4.19%

-36.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.24%

-2.13%

-23.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

—

—

Volatility

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DJAD.DECEMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.00%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.81%

7.94%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

7.94%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

7.94%

+6.63%

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DJAD.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMC.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DJAD.DE vs. CEMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

DJAD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while CEMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CEMC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DJAD.DE
Amundi US Treasury Bond Long Dated UCITS ETF Dist		3.47%3.50%3.53%2.89%3.36%2.22%2.38%2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

DJAD.DE and CEMC.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DJAD.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DJAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CEMC.DE.

DJAD.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while CEMC.DE is Long-Term Bond. DJAD.DE tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while CEMC.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for DJAD.DE and 0.10% for CEMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DJAD.DE and CEMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer