PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEMC.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than ISPA.DE's 8.40% return.


CEMC.DE

1D
0.36%
1M
-2.92%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISPA.DE

1D
1.43%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
8.40%
6M
14.85%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
8.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEMC.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEMC.DE

ISPA.DE
ISPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CEMC.DEISPA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.66

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between CEMC.DE and ISPA.DE is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

CEMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISPA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CEMC.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
3.88%4.52%4.89%5.91%6.92%3.32%4.04%4.02%3.37%5.66%3.64%4.35%

Drawdowns

CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, smaller than the maximum ISPA.DE drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMC.DE and ISPA.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CEMC.DEISPA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-38.91%

+34.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-0.65%

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-4.50%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

Volatility

CEMC.DE vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CEMC.DEISPA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

12.69%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.80%

12.01%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.80%

14.86%

-7.06%