CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE).
CEMC.DE and SXR8.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEMC.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE US Treasury 10-20 Year Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2025. SXR8.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both CEMC.DE and SXR8.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEMC.DE iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | -0.71% | 2.22% |
SXR8.DE iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -3.01% | 12.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEMC.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than SXR8.DE's -3.01% return.
CEMC.DE
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SXR8.DE
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -3.01%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- 10.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEMC.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SXR8.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEMC.DE
SXR8.DE
CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 10-20yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (CEMC.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEMC.DE | SXR8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.74 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEMC.DE and SXR8.DE is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEMC.DE nor SXR8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, smaller than the maximum SXR8.DE drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEMC.DE and SXR8.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEMC.DE | SXR8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -33.78% | +28.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -5.21% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -5.22% | +3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.32% | — |
Volatility
CEMC.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEMC.DE | SXR8.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.80% | 17.20% | -9.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.80% | 15.19% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.80% | 16.14% | -8.34% |