DIVS vs. DURA
DIVS (SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF) and DURA (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while DURA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Valuation Index. DIVS is actively managed, while DURA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIVS returned 9.70%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for DURA. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DIVS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for DURA.
Performance
DIVS vs. DURA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVS achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly lower than DURA's 15.95% return.
DIVS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 1Y
- 16.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.99%
DURA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 15.95%
- 1Y
- 22.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.08K | $44.03K | $61.52K | |
| $68.16K | $85.30K | $69.37K |
DIVS vs. DURA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 12.05% | 11.66% | 12.60% | 15.98% | -8.97% | 17.30% |
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 15.95% | 7.61% | 8.51% | 0.82% | 2.41% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVS and DURA is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2021 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DIVS and DURA has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DIVS vs. DURA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVS
DURA
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
DIVS
DURA
Technology
DIVS
DURA
Consumer Defensive
DIVS
DURA
Healthcare
DIVS
DURA
Financial Services
DIVS
DURA
Communication Services
DIVS
DURA
Consumer Cyclical
DIVS
DURA
Basic Materials
DIVS
-
DURA
Energy
DIVS
-
DURA
Real Estate
DIVS
-
DURA
-
Utilities
DIVS
-
DURA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVS vs. DURA — Risk / Return Rank
DIVS
DURA
DIVS vs. DURA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVS | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.33 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.55 | -0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.75 | 10.15 | -4.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVS vs. DURA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVS drawdown since its inception was -29.55%, smaller than the maximum DURA drawdown of -33.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVS and DURA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVS | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.55% | -33.15% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -8.53% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.61% | -14.27% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.71% | -15.80% | -4.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -1.69% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -3.88% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 2.14% | +0.76% |
Volatility
DIVS vs. DURA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF (DIVS) is 3.12%, while VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF (DURA) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that DIVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DURA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVS | DURA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 3.81% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.69% | 8.15% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 14.83% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.07% | 13.67% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 16.89% | +8.99% |
DIVS vs. DURA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DURA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVS vs. DURA - Dividend Comparison
DIVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than DURA's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVS SmartETFs Dividend Builder ETF | 2.78% | 2.61% | 2.66% | 3.14% | 5.93% | 3.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DURA VanEck Vectors Morningstar Durable Dividend ETF | 3.13% | 3.59% | 3.33% | 3.58% | 3.01% | 2.89% | 3.49% | 3.83% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVS and DURA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DURA has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to DIVS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVS dropped -29.55% vs DURA's -33.15%.
On 5-year performance, DIVS leads with 9.70% vs 7.63% for DURA. On fees, DURA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DIVS has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVS has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 7.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DURA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVS.
DURA has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.78% for DIVS.
DIVS is categorized as Global Equities, while DURA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVS and 0.29% for DURA.
DIVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVS and DURA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer