PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVP vs. EIPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVP vs. EIPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVP achieves a 7.90% return, which is significantly lower than EIPI's 14.55% return.


DIVP

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.18%
YTD
7.90%
6M
9.10%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EIPI

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
14.55%
6M
13.67%
1Y
21.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVP vs. EIPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
7.90%7.76%3.77%
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
14.55%12.38%12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVP and EIPI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024

0.54

The correlation between DIVP and EIPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVP vs. EIPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVP
EIPI

Healthcare

17.9%

-

Financial Services

16.1%

-

Energy

11.6%
62.8%

Industrials

9.3%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%

-

Technology

8.6%

-

Communication Services

8.0%

-

Real Estate

6.5%

-

Utilities

6.3%
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%

-

Basic Materials

2.4%
0.7%

Healthcare

DIVP
17.9%
EIPI

-

Financial Services

DIVP
16.1%
EIPI

-

Energy

DIVP
11.6%
EIPI
62.8%

Industrials

DIVP
9.3%
EIPI
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

DIVP
9.0%
EIPI

-

Technology

DIVP
8.6%
EIPI

-

Communication Services

DIVP
8.0%
EIPI

-

Real Estate

DIVP
6.5%
EIPI

-

Utilities

DIVP
6.3%
EIPI
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVP
4.4%
EIPI

-

Basic Materials

DIVP
2.4%
EIPI
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVP vs. EIPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVP
DIVP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DIVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EIPI
EIPI Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EIPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVP vs. EIPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) and FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVPEIPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

5.39

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

16.30

-10.82

DIVP vs. EIPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the EIPI Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVP and EIPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVPEIPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.26

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.52

-0.69

Drawdowns

DIVP vs. EIPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVP drawdown since its inception was -12.26%, roughly equal to the maximum EIPI drawdown of -12.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVP and EIPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVPEIPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-12.33%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

-4.00%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-2.62%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-1.67%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.32%

+1.25%

Volatility

DIVP vs. EIPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP) is 2.43%, while FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF (EIPI) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that DIVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVPEIPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

3.59%

-1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

7.30%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

9.55%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

13.08%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.78%

13.08%

-1.30%

DIVP vs. EIPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPI's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVP vs. EIPI - Dividend Comparison

DIVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than EIPI's 6.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
5.69%6.06%5.92%
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
6.78%9.71%6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVP and EIPI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIPI has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to DIVP (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVP dropped -12.26% vs EIPI's -12.33%.

On 1-year performance, EIPI leads with 21.45% vs 14.04% for DIVP. On fees, DIVP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, DIVP has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EIPI has performed better with a 21.45% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for EIPI.

EIPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 5.69% for DIVP.

They also come from different issuers: Cullen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DIVP and 1.11% for EIPI.

EIPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVP and EIPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer