PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVO vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVO vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.28% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -4.36% return.


DIVO

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.64%
YTD
5.28%
6M
5.66%
1Y
17.72%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

SIVR

1D
0.02%
1M
-15.70%
YTD
-4.36%
6M
16.92%
1Y
88.66%
3Y*
40.57%
5Y*
19.25%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVO vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.28%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-3.18%21.41%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-4.36%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and SIVR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2016

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVO vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVOSIVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.10

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

4.42

+6.37

DIVO vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVOSIVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.50

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.53

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.30

+0.54

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVOSIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-75.85%

+45.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-42.42%

+36.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

-42.42%

+30.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-42.42%

+28.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-41.65%

+40.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-47.85%

+45.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

20.12%

-18.47%

Volatility

DIVO vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) is 2.30%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that DIVO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVOSIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

16.89%

-14.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

58.88%

-51.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

59.47%

-50.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.95%

36.35%

-24.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

31.96%

-17.12%

DIVO vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVO vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.43%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVO and SIVR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to DIVO (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

On 5-year performance, SIVR leads with 19.25% vs 10.72% for DIVO. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 19.25% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while SIVR is Silver. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.30% for SIVR.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVO and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer