PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVO vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVO vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.


DIVO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.82%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.06%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.70%
6M
2.79%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVO vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and RBIL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVO vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVORBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

2.39

-1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

17.00

-13.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

70.66

-59.45

DIVO vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVORBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

5.01

-2.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

4.28

-3.43

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVORBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-0.50%

-29.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-0.27%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

0.00%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-0.06%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

0.07%

+1.57%

Volatility

DIVO vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a higher volatility of 2.01% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that DIVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVORBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

0.30%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

0.79%

+6.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.97%

0.92%

+8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.94%

1.05%

+10.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

1.05%

+13.79%

DIVO vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVO vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.42%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.60%3.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVO and RBIL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVO has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

On 1-year performance, DIVO leads with 18.37% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 18.37% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.

DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVO and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer