PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVO vs. DBMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVO vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVO achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 10.27% return.


DIVO

1D
0.72%
1M
2.73%
YTD
6.43%
6M
5.62%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*

DBMF

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
10.27%
6M
11.24%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVO vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.43%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%12.13%
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
10.27%13.85%7.24%-8.94%21.61%11.49%1.80%10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVO and DBMF is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.16

The correlation between DIVO and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (5 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVO vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVO vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVODBMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

4.50

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.23

16.30

-5.07

DIVO vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVO and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVO vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVO drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVO and DBMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVODBMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-20.39%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-6.10%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

-15.60%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

-20.39%

+6.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.91%

+1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-6.56%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.68%

-0.03%

Volatility

DIVO vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVODBMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.71%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.13%

10.00%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

12.35%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.97%

12.55%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.83%

12.41%

+2.42%

DIVO vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVO vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than DBMF's 5.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.19%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%0.00%0.00%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.36%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVO and DBMF have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBMF has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to DIVO (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVO dropped -30.04% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.91% vs 8.01% for DBMF. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.36%, compared with 5.19% for DBMF.

DIVO is categorized as Derivative Income, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for DIVO and 0.85% for DBMF.

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVO and DBMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer