PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVN vs. INCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVN vs. INCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DIVN having a 14.73% return and INCE slightly higher at 14.91%.


DIVN

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.08%
6M
7.52%
YTD
14.73%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.56%

INCE

1D
0.47%
1M
0.96%
6M
7.74%
YTD
14.91%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.52M$5.71M$2.75M
$621.36K$657.47K$945.62K

DIVN vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
14.73%8.11%
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
14.91%10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVN and INCE is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.82

The correlation between DIVN and INCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVN vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

INCE
INCE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIVN vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVNINCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.58

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.06

5.24

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

20.20

-8.77

DIVN vs. INCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVN Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the INCE Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVN and INCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVN vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVN drawdown since its inception was -5.55%, smaller than the maximum INCE drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVN and INCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVNINCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-33.95%

+28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-4.90%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.16%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.35%

-3.22%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.27%

+0.70%

Volatility

DIVN vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.46%. This indicates that DIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVNINCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.46%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

6.15%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

8.40%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.51%

13.25%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.51%

15.60%

-5.09%

DIVN vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVN vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison

DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than INCE's 4.84% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
3.70%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
4.84%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVN and INCE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVN has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to INCE (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVN dropped -5.55% vs INCE's -33.95%.

On 1-year performance, INCE leads with 26.00% vs 22.46% for DIVN. On fees, INCE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INCE has performed better with a 26.00% return vs 22.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INCE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DIVN.

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 3.70% for DIVN.

DIVN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DIVN and 0.29% for INCE.

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVN and INCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer