DIVN vs. FLXN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DIVN (Horizon Dividend Income ETF) and FLXN (Horizon Flexible Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIVN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Horizon, while FLXN is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIVN returned 22.46% vs 8.24% for FLXN. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DIVN charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for FLXN.

Performance

DIVN vs. FLXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVN achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than FLXN's 3.39% return.

DIVN

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 7.52%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 1Y: 22.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.56%

FLXN

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 2.24%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 1Y: 8.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	$11.52M	$5.71M	$2.75M
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF	$3.09M	$1.53M	$764.80K

DIVN vs. FLXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	14.73%	4.89%
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF	3.39%	4.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVN and FLXN is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

DIVN vs. FLXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIVN

DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 86
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FLXN

FLXN Risk / Return Rank: 69
FLXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FLXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FLXN Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FLXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FLXN Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIVN vs. FLXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVN	FLXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.63	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	2.47	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.33	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.06	2.44	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.43	11.75	-0.32

DIVN vs. FLXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVN Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the FLXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVN and FLXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVN vs. FLXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVN drawdown since its inception was -5.55%, which is greater than FLXN's maximum drawdown of -3.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVN and FLXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVN	FLXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.55%	-3.39%	-2.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.55%	-3.39%	-2.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-0.05%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.35%	-0.37%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	0.70%	+1.27%

Volatility

DIVN vs. FLXN - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Horizon Flexible Income ETF (FLXN) at 1.23%. This indicates that DIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVN	FLXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	1.23%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.52%	4.07%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.36%	5.08%	+5.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.51%	4.94%	+5.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.51%	4.94%	+5.57%

DIVN vs. FLXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXN's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVN vs. FLXN - Dividend Comparison

DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than FLXN's 9.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
DIVN Horizon Dividend Income ETF	3.70%	1.47%
FLXN Horizon Flexible Income ETF	9.26%	3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVN and FLXN in my portfolio?

DIVN and FLXN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVN or FLXN?

DIVN has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to FLXN (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVN dropped -5.55% vs FLXN's -3.39%.

Which ETF is better, DIVN or FLXN?

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.46% vs 8.24% for FLXN. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FLXN has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVN or FLXN?

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.46% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVN or FLXN?

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for FLXN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVN or FLXN?

FLXN has the higher dividend yield at 9.26%, compared with 3.70% for DIVN.

What is the main difference between DIVN and FLXN?

DIVN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FLXN is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DIVN and 0.82% for FLXN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.