DIVL vs. VTV
DIVL (Madison Dividend Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DIVL is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past year, DIVL returned 14.51% vs 26.25% for VTV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIVL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
DIVL vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVL achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return.
DIVL
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
DIVL vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF | 8.16% | 9.83% | 8.81% | 1.81% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 5.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVL and VTV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DIVL and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIVL vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIVL
VTV
Energy
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Energy
DIVL
VTV
Industrials
DIVL
VTV
Financial Services
DIVL
VTV
Healthcare
DIVL
VTV
Consumer Defensive
DIVL
VTV
Technology
DIVL
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
DIVL
VTV
Basic Materials
DIVL
VTV
Utilities
DIVL
VTV
Real Estate
DIVL
VTV
Communication Services
DIVL
-
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVL vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
DIVL
VTV
DIVL vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIVL | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.47 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 4.15 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | 15.69 | -9.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIVL | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.61 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.51 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
DIVL vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVL drawdown since its inception was -14.06%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVL and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVL | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.06% | -59.27% | +45.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -6.35% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | 0.00% | -3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -7.87% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 1.68% | +0.61% |
Volatility
DIVL vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.52%. This indicates that DIVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVL | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 2.52% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.05% | 7.55% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 10.11% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 13.88% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 16.67% | -4.28% |
DIVL vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVL vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
DIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF | 1.77% | 1.80% | 2.19% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVL and VTV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVL has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVL dropped -14.06% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 1-year performance, VTV leads with 26.25% vs 14.51% for DIVL. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTV has performed better with a 26.25% return vs 14.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVL.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.77% for DIVL.
They also come from different issuers: Madison and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVL and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIVL and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer