DIVL vs. LVDS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DIVL (Madison Dividend Value ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIVL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.

Performance

DIVL vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVL achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly lower than LVDS's 13.56% return.

DIVL

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 8.16%
• 6M: 7.23%
• 1Y: 14.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LVDS

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 6M: 14.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVL vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	8.16%	2.58%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	13.56%	7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVL and LVDS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.84

DIVL vs. LVDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVL	LVDS
Energy	17.2%	6.6%
Industrials	16.8%	10.2%
Financial Services	13.8%	18.3%
Healthcare	11.6%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	10.2%	6.5%
Technology	8.2%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	8.0%
Basic Materials	6.1%	1.7%
Utilities	6.0%	4.8%
Real Estate	2.4%	4.2%
Communication Services	-	7.5%

Return for Risk

DIVL vs. LVDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVL

DIVL Risk / Return Rank: 40
DIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
DIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
DIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
DIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVL vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIVL	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIVL	LVDS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	2.39	-1.55

Drawdowns

DIVL vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVL drawdown since its inception was -14.06%, which is greater than LVDS's maximum drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVL and LVDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVL	LVDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-6.64%	-7.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.34%	0.00%	-3.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.56%	-0.98%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DIVL	LVDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	10.43%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.39%	10.43%	+1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.39%	10.43%	+1.96%

DIVL vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVL vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

DIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than LVDS's 7.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	1.77%	1.80%	2.19%	1.01%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	7.56%	8.25%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVL and LVDS in my portfolio?

DIVL and LVDS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DIVL or LVDS?

On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVL or LVDS?

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVL or LVDS?

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 1.77% for DIVL.

What is the main difference between DIVL and LVDS?

They also come from different issuers: Madison and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVL and 0.30% for LVDS.