DIVL vs. DIVZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DIVL (Madison Dividend Value ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIVL returned 12.44% vs 11.08% for DIVZ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVL achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 4.54% return.

DIVL

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 5.80%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVZ

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 4.54%
• 6M: 3.63%
• 1Y: 11.08%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	6.99%	9.83%	8.81%	1.30%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	4.54%	16.72%	18.44%	2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVL and DIVZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023	0.82

The correlation between DIVL and DIVZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVL	DIVZ
Energy	16.5%	14.7%
Industrials	15.9%	9.8%
Financial Services	13.9%	9.4%
Healthcare	11.5%	18.2%
Consumer Defensive	11.3%	19.5%
Technology	9.0%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	3.7%
Basic Materials	6.5%	5.7%
Utilities	5.5%	13.1%
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Communication Services	-	5.6%

Return for Risk

DIVL vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVL

DIVL Risk / Return Rank: 37
DIVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DIVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
DIVL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
DIVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DIVL Martin Ratio Rank: 37

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 36
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 32
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVL	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.18	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	1.72	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.20	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.91	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.14	4.51	+0.63

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVL and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVL drawdown since its inception was -14.06%, smaller than the maximum DIVZ drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVL and DIVZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVL	DIVZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-15.42%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-5.83%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.39%	-3.17%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-3.48%	+0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.46%	-0.04%

Volatility

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) is 3.00%, while Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that DIVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVL	DIVZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	3.46%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.94%	7.25%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.70%	9.48%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.35%	12.63%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.35%	12.56%	-0.21%

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DIVL and DIVZ have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

DIVL vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

DIVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than DIVZ's 2.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF	1.79%	1.80%	2.19%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.56%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVL and DIVZ in my portfolio?

DIVL and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVL or DIVZ?

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to DIVL (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVL dropped -14.06% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

Which ETF is better, DIVL or DIVZ?

On 1-year performance, DIVL leads with 12.44% vs 11.08% for DIVZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, DIVL has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVL or DIVZ?

Over the 1-year period, DIVL has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVL or DIVZ?

DIVL and DIVZ have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVL or DIVZ?

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.79% for DIVL.

What is the main difference between DIVL and DIVZ?

They also come from different issuers: Madison and TrueShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.