PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVI vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVI vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVI achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 30.63% return.


DIVI

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.35%
6M
8.47%
YTD
12.20%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
11.04%

KEMX

1D
-2.10%
1M
-7.36%
6M
22.54%
YTD
30.63%
1Y
53.99%
3Y*
24.03%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVI vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
12.20%34.86%1.77%18.97%-1.21%16.95%1.29%9.94%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
30.63%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVI and KEMX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.72

The correlation between DIVI and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVI vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIVI
KEMX

Financial Services

28.7%
18.7%

Industrials

17.0%
7.6%

Technology

11.8%
46.8%

Healthcare

9.0%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
2.6%

Basic Materials

5.2%
7.6%

Communication Services

4.6%
2.9%

Utilities

4.4%
1.7%

Energy

3.3%
4.0%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.0%

Financial Services

DIVI
28.7%
KEMX
18.7%

Industrials

DIVI
17.0%
KEMX
7.6%

Technology

DIVI
11.8%
KEMX
46.8%

Healthcare

DIVI
9.0%
KEMX
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DIVI
6.9%
KEMX
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

DIVI
6.8%
KEMX
2.6%

Basic Materials

DIVI
5.2%
KEMX
7.6%

Communication Services

DIVI
4.6%
KEMX
2.9%

Utilities

DIVI
4.4%
KEMX
1.7%

Energy

DIVI
3.3%
KEMX
4.0%

Real Estate

DIVI
2.2%
KEMX
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVI vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVI
DIVI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DIVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVI vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVIKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.53

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.63

12.27

-2.64

DIVI vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVI and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVI vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVI drawdown since its inception was -27.76%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVI and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVIKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.76%

-38.80%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

-15.36%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-19.62%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-30.85%

+12.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-11.09%

+10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-8.80%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

4.41%

-1.67%

Volatility

DIVI vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) is 3.79%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 10.24%. This indicates that DIVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVIKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

10.24%

-6.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.11%

24.24%

-11.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

26.14%

-10.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.44%

19.21%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

21.42%

-5.10%

DIVI vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVI has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIVI vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

DIVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than KEMX's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIVI
Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
3.61%3.76%4.39%3.17%6.03%2.77%8.04%1.61%5.67%5.22%11.56%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.51%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVI and KEMX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (10.24%) compared to DIVI (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVI dropped -27.76% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.54% vs 12.43% for KEMX. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 12.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.

DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.51% for KEMX.

DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DIVI and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVI and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer