PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVG vs. XCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DIVG vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DIVG vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DIVG
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF
6.82%11.31%16.60%5.71%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.35%10.25%20.67%4.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVG achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly higher than XCLR's -5.35% return.


DIVG

1D
0.79%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
6.82%
6M
7.54%
1Y
13.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XCLR

1D
1.50%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.90%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DIVG vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DIVG vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVG
DIVG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DIVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVG vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVGXCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.96

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.50

5.31

+0.19

DIVG vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVG Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVG and XCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVGXCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.96

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.35

0.58

+0.77

Correlation

The correlation between DIVG and XCLR is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DIVG vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

DIVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than XCLR's 13.90% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
DIVG
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF
3.08%3.15%4.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
13.90%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%

Drawdowns

DIVG vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVG drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, roughly equal to the maximum XCLR drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVG and XCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVGXCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-14.63%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-8.29%

-3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-6.91%

+4.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-4.82%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.98%

+0.81%

Volatility

DIVG vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Growers ETF (DIVG) is 2.79%, while Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that DIVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DIVGXCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

3.39%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

7.15%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

10.52%

+4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

10.58%

+2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

10.58%

+2.85%