DIVE vs. DIVB
DIVE (Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both Dividend funds. DIVE is actively managed, while DIVB is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIVE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.
Performance
DIVE vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIVE achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than DIVB's 17.12% return.
DIVE
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 17.12%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 26.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVE vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIVE Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF | 0.47% | 1.94% |
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 17.12% | 4.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIVE and DIVB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIVE vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank
DIVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIVB
DIVE vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF (DIVE) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIVE | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIVE vs. DIVB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIVE drawdown since its inception was -11.45%, smaller than the maximum DIVB drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVE and DIVB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIVE | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -36.93% | +25.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -1.12% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.15% | -4.97% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility
DIVE vs. DIVB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIVE | DIVB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 11.68% | +1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 15.26% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 18.36% | -5.36% |
DIVE vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIVE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIVE vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison
DIVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than DIVB's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF | 2.27% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.18% | 2.02% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 2.07% | 2.52% | 0.37% |
DIVE Dana Concentrated Dividend ETF | 0.98% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIVE and DIVB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVE.
DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.98% for DIVE.
They also come from different issuers: Dana and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DIVE and 0.05% for DIVB.
Find the right allocation for DIVE and DIVB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer