DIVD vs. SFGV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DIVD (Altrius Global Dividend ETF) and SFGV (Sequoia Global Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DIVD returned 31.43% vs 26.03% for SFGV. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DIVD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for SFGV.

Performance

DIVD vs. SFGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVD achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly higher than SFGV's 13.93% return.

DIVD

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.99%
• 6M: 10.96%
• YTD: 17.92%
• 1Y: 31.43%
• 3Y*: 16.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.44%

SFGV

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 1.16%
• 6M: 7.57%
• YTD: 13.93%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF	$90.64K	$113.22K	$112.98K
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	$327.92K	$400.72K	$470.11K

DIVD vs. SFGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF	17.92%	26.18%	4.87%
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	13.93%	18.84%	11.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVD and SFGV is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024	0.86

The correlation between DIVD and SFGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIVD vs. SFGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIVD	SFGV
Healthcare	20.9%	9.2%
Financial Services	20.8%	45.3%
Consumer Defensive	18.4%	6.5%
Industrials	12.5%	11.1%
Energy	7.9%	5.6%
Technology	5.8%	6.7%
Basic Materials	4.7%	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	9.8%
Communication Services	3.3%	1.5%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.2%
Utilities	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

DIVD vs. SFGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DIVD

DIVD Risk / Return Rank: 94
DIVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
DIVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DIVD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
DIVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DIVD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SFGV

SFGV Risk / Return Rank: 87
SFGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
SFGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SFGV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
SFGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SFGV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DIVD vs. SFGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIVD	SFGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	2.22	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	3.20	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.40	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	3.04	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.76	11.70	+6.06

DIVD vs. SFGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVD Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the SFGV Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVD and SFGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIVD vs. SFGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVD drawdown since its inception was -13.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SFGV drawdown of -14.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVD and SFGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIVD	SFGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.88%	-14.51%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-8.36%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.89%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-1.81%	-0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	2.17%	-0.46%

Volatility

DIVD vs. SFGV - Volatility Comparison

Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) at 2.75%. This indicates that DIVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIVD	SFGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.23%	2.75%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.27%	8.72%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.19%	11.54%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.17%	13.08%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.17%	13.08%	+0.09%

DIVD vs. SFGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SFGV's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIVD vs. SFGV - Dividend Comparison

DIVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than SFGV's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF	2.72%	2.86%	3.39%	2.96%	0.60%
SFGV Sequoia Global Value ETF	2.34%	2.52%	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIVD and SFGV in my portfolio?

DIVD and SFGV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIVD or SFGV?

DIVD has higher volatility (3.23%) compared to SFGV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVD dropped -13.88% vs SFGV's -14.51%.

Which ETF is better, DIVD or SFGV?

On 1-year performance, DIVD leads with 31.43% vs 26.03% for SFGV. On fees, SFGV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, SFGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIVD or SFGV?

Over the 1-year period, DIVD has performed better with a 31.43% return vs 26.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIVD or SFGV?

SFGV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DIVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIVD or SFGV?

DIVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.34% for SFGV.

What is the main difference between DIVD and SFGV?

They also come from different issuers: Altrius and Sequoia Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for DIVD and 0.33% for SFGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.