PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVB vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVB vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVB achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 15.52% return.


DIVB

1D
-0.39%
1M
4.50%
6M
17.92%
YTD
21.10%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.10%

VBR

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.04%
6M
8.72%
YTD
15.52%
1Y
23.17%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.50%
ALL TIME*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVB vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
21.10%15.09%18.59%13.27%-10.51%31.29%10.78%32.72%-8.16%5.95%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
15.52%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVB and VBR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.86

The correlation between DIVB and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVB vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVB
DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVB vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVBVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

2.63

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.18

9.32

+4.85

DIVB vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVB Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVB and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVB vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVB drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVB and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVBVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-61.98%

+25.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.82%

-8.85%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.45%

-24.19%

+8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-24.19%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.45%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-8.22%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.49%

-0.46%

Volatility

DIVB vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 2.90%. This indicates that DIVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVBVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

2.90%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

10.49%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

15.00%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

19.58%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

21.66%

-3.31%

DIVB vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DIVB and VBR have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIVB vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than VBR's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVB
iShares Core Dividend ETF
2.19%2.50%2.61%3.18%2.02%1.63%2.08%2.07%2.52%0.37%0.00%0.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.78%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVB and VBR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVB has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to VBR (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVB dropped -36.93% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 5-year performance, DIVB leads with 12.76% vs 9.61% for VBR. Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVB has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVB and VBR have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.78% for VBR.

DIVB is categorized as Dividend, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. DIVB tracks Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard.

DIVB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVB and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer