DIV vs. XLU
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 4.30%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for XLU. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
DIV vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 5.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 4.30%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
DIV vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and XLU is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.56 |
The correlation between DIV and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIV vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
XLU
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
DIV
XLU
-
Real Estate
DIV
XLU
-
Utilities
DIV
XLU
Industrials
DIV
XLU
-
Consumer Defensive
DIV
XLU
-
Communication Services
DIV
XLU
-
Basic Materials
DIV
XLU
-
Financial Services
DIV
XLU
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
XLU
-
Healthcare
DIV
XLU
-
Technology
DIV
-
XLU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
XLU
DIV vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 1.30 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 2.80 | +5.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, roughly equal to the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -51.98% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -9.18% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -17.26% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -25.26% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -36.07% | -16.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -6.05% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -10.22% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 4.25% | -2.37% |
Volatility
DIV vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.07%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 5.59% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.08% | 11.68% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.32% | 14.66% | -4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 17.34% | -3.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 19.27% | -1.29% |
DIV vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than XLU's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and XLU have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs XLU's -51.98%.
On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.20% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 2.67% for XLU.
DIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.08% for XLU.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer