PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIV vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIV vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 15.81% return, which is significantly lower than QVAL's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed QVAL with an annualized return of 4.02%, while QVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.


DIV

1D
0.47%
1M
1.16%
6M
12.75%
YTD
15.81%
1Y
16.03%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
4.02%

QVAL

1D
0.58%
1M
0.23%
6M
12.19%
YTD
17.24%
1Y
29.66%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIV vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
15.81%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
17.24%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%34.40%-5.93%24.06%-17.28%25.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DIV and QVAL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.69

The correlation between DIV and QVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIV vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIV
QVAL

Real Estate

21.2%
2.0%

Energy

18.3%
16.1%

Industrials

16.3%
14.1%

Utilities

11.5%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.1%
9.8%

Communication Services

6.1%
6.0%

Basic Materials

4.3%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
23.8%

Financial Services

4.1%

-

Healthcare

3.3%
13.9%

Technology

-

8.3%

Real Estate

DIV
21.2%
QVAL
2.0%

Energy

DIV
18.3%
QVAL
16.1%

Industrials

DIV
16.3%
QVAL
14.1%

Utilities

DIV
11.5%
QVAL
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

DIV
11.1%
QVAL
9.8%

Communication Services

DIV
6.1%
QVAL
6.0%

Basic Materials

DIV
4.3%
QVAL
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DIV
4.1%
QVAL
23.8%

Financial Services

DIV
4.1%
QVAL

-

Healthcare

DIV
3.3%
QVAL
13.9%

Technology

DIV

-

QVAL
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIV vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIV vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVQVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

4.94

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

14.02

-5.69

DIV vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the QVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIV and QVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIV vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, roughly equal to the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and QVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.74%

-51.49%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.23%

-6.04%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-21.41%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-27.17%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

-51.49%

-1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-7.73%

+0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.13%

-0.20%

Volatility

DIV vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.80%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

10.05%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

14.54%

-3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

21.60%

-7.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

22.70%

-4.71%

DIV vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIV vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than QVAL's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.64%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIV and QVAL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs QVAL's -51.49%.

On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.55% vs 4.02% for DIV. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 1.46% for QVAL.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.28% for QVAL.

QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIV and QVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer