DIV vs. QVAL
DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) and QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. DIV is passively managed, while QVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, DIV returned 4.14%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for QVAL. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIV charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QVAL.
Performance
DIV vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIV achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly lower than QVAL's 14.09% return. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed QVAL with an annualized return of 4.14%, while QVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.
DIV
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 15.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
QVAL
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 14.09%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
DIV vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 13.39% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 14.09% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 34.40% | -5.93% | 24.06% | -17.28% | 25.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIV and QVAL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between DIV and QVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIV vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIV
QVAL
Energy
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
-
Energy
DIV
QVAL
Real Estate
DIV
QVAL
Industrials
DIV
QVAL
Utilities
DIV
QVAL
Consumer Defensive
DIV
QVAL
Communication Services
DIV
QVAL
Basic Materials
DIV
QVAL
Financial Services
DIV
QVAL
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIV
QVAL
Healthcare
DIV
QVAL
Technology
DIV
-
QVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIV vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank
DIV
QVAL
DIV vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIV | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.33 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 4.78 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.09 | 13.37 | -5.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIV vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, roughly equal to the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and QVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIV | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.74% | -51.49% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.23% | -6.04% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.33% | -21.41% | +9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.14% | -27.17% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.74% | -51.49% | -1.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -2.47% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -7.76% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.15% | -0.23% |
Volatility
DIV vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) is 3.68%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that DIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIV | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.95% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 10.21% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 14.71% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 21.64% | -7.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 22.78% | -4.78% |
DIV vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIV vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison
DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than QVAL's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.77% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.16% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIV and QVAL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVAL has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs QVAL's -51.49%.
On 10-year performance, QVAL leads with 11.91% vs 4.14% for DIV. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QVAL has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.77%, compared with 1.16% for QVAL.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.28% for QVAL.
QVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIV and QVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer