PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIV vs. FGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIV vs. FGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DIV having a 11.63% return and FGD slightly lower at 11.09%. Over the past 10 years, DIV has underperformed FGD with an annualized return of 3.95%, while FGD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.79% annualized return.


DIV

1D
-1.38%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
11.63%
6M
10.20%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
3.95%

FGD

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.09%
YTD
11.09%
6M
12.57%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIV vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
11.63%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
11.09%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DIV and FGD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2013

0.69

The correlation between DIV and FGD shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIV vs. FGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIV
FGD

Energy

21.5%
10.0%

Real Estate

19.8%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

13.4%
9.2%

Utilities

12.0%
4.9%

Industrials

11.5%
14.3%

Communication Services

6.3%
9.3%

Basic Materials

4.6%
6.4%

Financial Services

3.9%
33.6%

Healthcare

3.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
8.8%

Technology

-

1.2%

Energy

DIV
21.5%
FGD
10.0%

Real Estate

DIV
19.8%
FGD
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

DIV
13.4%
FGD
9.2%

Utilities

DIV
12.0%
FGD
4.9%

Industrials

DIV
11.5%
FGD
14.3%

Communication Services

DIV
6.3%
FGD
9.3%

Basic Materials

DIV
4.6%
FGD
6.4%

Financial Services

DIV
3.9%
FGD
33.6%

Healthcare

DIV
3.6%
FGD

-

Consumer Cyclical

DIV
3.5%
FGD
8.8%

Technology

DIV

-

FGD
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIV vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIV vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIVFGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.41

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

12.03

-4.25

DIV vs. FGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the FGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIV and FGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIVFGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.67

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.70

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.54

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.26

+0.02

Drawdowns

DIV vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIV drawdown since its inception was -52.74%, smaller than the maximum FGD drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIV and FGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVFGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.74%

-68.05%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.23%

-9.82%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

-11.50%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

-28.68%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

-44.84%

-7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.20%

-2.05%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-12.57%

+5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

2.78%

-0.93%

Volatility

DIV vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison

Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVFGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.20%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

9.73%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

12.56%

-2.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.68%

14.92%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

18.23%

-0.25%

DIV vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIV has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FGD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIV vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison

DIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than FGD's 5.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
7.36%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.09%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIV and FGD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FGD has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to DIV (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIV dropped -52.74% vs FGD's -68.05%.

On 10-year performance, FGD leads with 9.79% vs 3.95% for DIV. On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FGD has performed better with a 9.79% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 5.09% for FGD.

DIV is categorized as Dividend, while FGD is Global Equities. DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index, while FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DIV and 0.59% for FGD.

FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIV and FGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer