PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DITEX vs. DAGVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DITEX vs. DAGVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DITEX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DITEX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than DAGVX's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DITEX has underperformed DAGVX with an annualized return of 1.94%, while DAGVX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.51% annualized return.


DITEX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.49%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
1.94%

DAGVX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.66%
YTD
14.05%
6M
15.50%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
13.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DITEX vs. DAGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DITEX
BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
1.15%5.56%1.21%5.35%-7.61%0.43%4.29%7.35%0.78%4.40%
DAGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund
14.05%18.20%14.16%12.54%1.43%30.90%3.66%26.74%-10.76%14.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DITEX and DAGVX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 1995

-0.09

The correlation between DITEX and DAGVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DITEX vs. DAGVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DITEX
DITEX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DITEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DITEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DITEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DITEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DITEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DAGVX
DAGVX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DAGVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DAGVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DAGVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DAGVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DAGVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DITEX vs. DAGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DITEX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DITEXDAGVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.46

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

4.56

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

16.85

-9.60

DITEX vs. DAGVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DITEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the DAGVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DITEX and DAGVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DITEXDAGVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

2.56

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.85

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.72

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.58

+0.58

Drawdowns

DITEX vs. DAGVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DITEX drawdown since its inception was -12.03%, smaller than the maximum DAGVX drawdown of -55.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DITEX and DAGVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DITEXDAGVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-55.04%

+43.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-6.69%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

-16.96%

+12.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-16.96%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.99%

-42.62%

+30.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-7.65%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

1.80%

-0.89%

Volatility

DITEX vs. DAGVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (DITEX) is 0.90%, while BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund (DAGVX) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that DITEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DITEXDAGVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

3.65%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.80%

9.13%

-7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

11.90%

-9.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.11%

15.58%

-12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.39%

18.83%

-15.44%

DITEX vs. DAGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DITEX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than DAGVX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

DITEX vs. DAGVX - Dividend Comparison

DITEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than DAGVX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DAGVX
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund
5.86%6.69%6.85%5.09%7.96%21.64%2.64%3.29%17.81%10.71%2.72%15.78%
DITEX
BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
2.91%3.46%2.86%2.38%2.11%2.03%2.51%3.38%3.47%2.99%3.69%3.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


DITEX and DAGVX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DAGVX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to DITEX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DITEX dropped -12.03% vs DAGVX's -55.04%.

DITEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DITEX and DAGVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer