PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISVX vs. MIDLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISVX vs. MIDLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio (DISVX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISVX achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than MIDLX's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, DISVX has outperformed MIDLX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while MIDLX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return.


DISVX

1D
0.06%
1M
3.32%
YTD
10.61%
6M
14.85%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
26.27%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
10.65%

MIDLX

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.42%
YTD
6.95%
6M
7.96%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
6.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISVX vs. MIDLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DISVX
DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio
10.61%52.17%7.88%17.58%-9.80%15.84%0.82%21.04%-23.36%25.41%
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
6.95%17.03%3.33%13.21%-18.52%5.17%10.15%24.97%-10.29%30.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DISVX and MIDLX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2012

0.87

The correlation between DISVX and MIDLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISVX vs. MIDLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISVX
DISVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DISVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DISVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MIDLX
MIDLX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MIDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISVX vs. MIDLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio (DISVX) and MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DISVXMIDLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.18

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

0.92

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

3.17

+6.41

DISVX vs. MIDLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the MIDLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISVX and MIDLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DISVXMIDLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

0.94

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.28

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.49

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Drawdowns

DISVX vs. MIDLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISVX drawdown since its inception was -61.57%, which is greater than MIDLX's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISVX and MIDLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISVXMIDLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.57%

-34.70%

-26.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-11.75%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-13.15%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.43%

-33.58%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.24%

-34.70%

-14.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.34%

-1.64%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-6.92%

-5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

3.41%

+0.29%

Volatility

DISVX vs. MIDLX - Volatility Comparison

DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio (DISVX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6 (MIDLX) at 3.48%. This indicates that DISVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIDLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISVXMIDLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

3.48%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

9.46%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

11.52%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

13.21%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

14.01%

+2.77%

DISVX vs. MIDLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISVX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDLX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISVX vs. MIDLX - Dividend Comparison

DISVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than MIDLX's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISVX
DFA International Small Cap Value Portfolio
6.52%7.17%4.56%3.87%2.40%3.51%1.84%3.97%5.91%3.77%5.85%3.51%
MIDLX
MFS International New Discovery Fund Class R6
3.15%3.37%10.08%4.21%5.85%5.19%4.03%4.36%6.82%1.63%1.09%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISVX and MIDLX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DISVX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to MIDLX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISVX dropped -61.57% vs MIDLX's -34.70%.

DISVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISVX and MIDLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer