DISV vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DISV (Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DISV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. DISV is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, DISV returned 28.97% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. DISV charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

DISV vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISV achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.

DISV

• 1D: -2.93%
• 1M: -3.68%
• YTD: 6.66%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 28.97%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISV vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF	6.66%	38.71%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DISV and RBIL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.17

Return for Risk

DISV vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISV

DISV Risk / Return Rank: 55
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 51

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISV vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DISV	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	4.35	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	6.69	-4.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	2.13	-0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	7.82	-5.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.44	42.95	-34.51

DISV vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISV Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISV and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DISV vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISV drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISV and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DISV	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.77%	-0.52%	-26.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.69%	-0.52%	-12.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.16%	-0.50%	-5.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-0.07%	-4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	0.10%	+3.34%

Volatility

DISV vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that DISV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DISV	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	0.36%	+5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.69%	0.85%	+11.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.19%	0.95%	+14.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	1.07%	+16.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	1.07%	+16.36%

DISV vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

DISV vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DISV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DISV Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF	2.48%	2.69%	2.77%	2.73%	1.23%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DISV and RBIL in my portfolio?

DISV and RBIL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DISV or RBIL?

DISV has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISV dropped -26.77% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, DISV or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, DISV leads with 28.97% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DISV or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, DISV has performed better with a 28.97% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DISV or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for DISV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DISV or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.48% for DISV.

What is the main difference between DISV and RBIL?

DISV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for DISV and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.