PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISV vs. FDTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISV vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISV achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than FDTS's 16.64% return.


DISV

1D
-1.06%
1M
3.34%
YTD
10.83%
6M
15.28%
1Y
34.34%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
10Y*

FDTS

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
16.64%
6M
19.06%
1Y
45.71%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISV vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
10.83%47.42%5.87%19.52%-9.72%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
16.64%51.17%2.44%10.96%-12.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DISV and FDTS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.79

The correlation between DISV and FDTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DISV vs. FDTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DISV
FDTS

Financial Services

18.6%
11.7%

Basic Materials

18.3%
11.2%

Industrials

18.1%
23.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.3%
18.4%

Energy

9.2%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
5.0%

Technology

4.1%
13.4%

Communication Services

3.4%
3.0%

Real Estate

3.2%
4.3%

Healthcare

3.0%
3.0%

Utilities

2.6%
2.7%

Financial Services

DISV
18.6%
FDTS
11.7%

Basic Materials

DISV
18.3%
FDTS
11.2%

Industrials

DISV
18.1%
FDTS
23.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DISV
15.3%
FDTS
18.4%

Energy

DISV
9.2%
FDTS
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

DISV
4.3%
FDTS
5.0%

Technology

DISV
4.1%
FDTS
13.4%

Communication Services

DISV
3.4%
FDTS
3.0%

Real Estate

DISV
3.2%
FDTS
4.3%

Healthcare

DISV
3.0%
FDTS
3.0%

Utilities

DISV
2.6%
FDTS
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISV vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISV
DISV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISV vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DISVFDTSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.69

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

3.52

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.64

-0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.27

13.32

-3.05

DISV vs. FDTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FDTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISV and FDTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DISVFDTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.69

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.37

+0.56

Drawdowns

DISV vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISV drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum FDTS drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISV and FDTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISVFDTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-51.26%

+24.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.69%

-12.61%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.15%

-13.19%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-6.49%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-10.65%

+5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.44%

-0.09%

Volatility

DISV vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) is 4.16%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that DISV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISVFDTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

6.54%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

14.09%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

17.05%

-2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

29.28%

-11.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

24.85%

-7.49%

DISV vs. FDTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISV vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison

DISV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than FDTS's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
2.39%2.69%2.77%2.73%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISV and FDTS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to DISV (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISV dropped -26.77% vs FDTS's -51.26%.

On 3-year performance, FDTS leads with 25.36% vs 24.35% for DISV. On fees, DISV is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, DISV has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 25.36% return vs 24.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DISV is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.39% for DISV.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for DISV and 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISV and FDTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer