PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISO vs. ZHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISO vs. ZHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISO achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than ZHDG's 5.32% return.


DISO

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
-11.11%
6M
-4.70%
1Y
-7.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZHDG

1D
0.18%
1M
4.17%
YTD
5.32%
6M
5.70%
1Y
18.66%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISO vs. ZHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DISO
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF
-11.11%2.12%14.56%9.09%
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
5.32%14.34%18.02%2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DISO and ZHDG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISO vs. ZHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISO
DISO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
DISO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
DISO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISO Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

ZHDG
ZHDG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ZHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISO vs. ZHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) and ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DISOZHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.32

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

2.19

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

9.14

-10.10

DISO vs. ZHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISO Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the ZHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISO and ZHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DISOZHDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.83

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.52

-0.30

Drawdowns

DISO vs. ZHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISO drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, which is greater than ZHDG's maximum drawdown of -23.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISO and ZHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISOZHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-23.27%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-8.56%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.58%

-0.42%

-13.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-8.15%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.96%

2.05%

+5.91%

Volatility

DISO vs. ZHDG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF (DISO) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF (ZHDG) at 2.77%. This indicates that DISO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISOZHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.96%

2.77%

+6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

8.06%

+8.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.22%

10.26%

+9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.52%

11.74%

+9.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.52%

11.74%

+9.78%

DISO vs. ZHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHDG's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISO vs. ZHDG - Dividend Comparison

DISO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.81%, more than ZHDG's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DISO
YieldMax DIS Option Income Strategy ETF
45.81%38.87%37.33%6.87%0.00%0.00%
ZHDG
ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
2.44%2.57%2.59%1.52%3.58%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISO and ZHDG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DISO has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to ZHDG (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISO dropped -26.62% vs ZHDG's -23.27%.

On 1-year performance, ZHDG leads with 18.66% vs -7.64% for DISO. On fees, ZHDG is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, ZHDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZHDG has performed better with a 18.66% return vs -7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZHDG is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DISO.

DISO has the higher dividend yield at 45.81%, compared with 2.44% for ZHDG.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ZEGA. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DISO and 0.98% for ZHDG.

ZHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISO and ZHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer