DIME vs. EZPZ
DIME (CoinShares Altcoins ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. DIME is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIME charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
DIME vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIME achieves a -18.48% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -28.21% return.
DIME
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 12.70%
- YTD
- -18.48%
- 6M
- -31.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- -39.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIME vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIME CoinShares Altcoins ETF | -18.48% | -54.22% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -28.21% | -30.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIME and EZPZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIME vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
DIME
EZPZ
DIME vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Altcoins ETF (DIME) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIME | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.01 | -0.61 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
DIME vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIME drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIME and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIME | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.25% | -52.38% | -17.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.50% | -51.59% | -11.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.65% | -21.72% | -32.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.44% | — |
Volatility
DIME vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIME | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.39% | 46.83% | +30.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.39% | 47.65% | +29.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.39% | 47.65% | +29.74% |
DIME vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIME has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DIME vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither DIME nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DIME and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIME is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIME is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZPZ.
DIME and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for DIME and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for DIME and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer