DIM vs. NTSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DIM (WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DIM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Index, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. DIM is passively managed, while NTSX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DIM returned 8.50%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for NTSX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIM charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.

Performance

DIM vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIM achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 6.46% return.

DIM

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 6.63%
• 1Y: 19.72%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: 8.79%

NTSX

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIM vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DIM WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund	7.28%	37.25%	3.51%	15.00%	-14.09%	9.55%	-0.40%	19.85%	-13.57%
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	6.46%	18.82%	20.20%	22.70%	-25.84%	22.21%	24.87%	32.03%	-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DIM and NTSX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018	0.70

The correlation between DIM and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DIM vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIM

DIM Risk / Return Rank: 43
DIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
DIM Omega Ratio Rank: 43
DIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
DIM Martin Ratio Rank: 45

NTSX

NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 50
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIM vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DIM	NTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.63	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.23	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.33	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.90	9.93	-3.03

DIM vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIM and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DIM vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIM drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIM and NTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIM	NTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.45%	-31.34%	-30.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	-9.16%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.13%	-16.82%	+4.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.71%	-31.34%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.30%	-3.02%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.60%	-6.76%	-5.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.14%	+0.73%

Volatility

DIM vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) is 4.39%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that DIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIM	NTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	5.26%	-0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.21%	10.56%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.41%	13.13%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	17.17%	-1.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	18.29%	-1.66%

DIM vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIM has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIM vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than NTSX's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIM WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund	2.84%	3.20%	3.58%	4.62%	3.96%	3.65%	2.53%	3.26%	3.28%	2.57%	2.94%	2.81%
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	1.10%	1.14%	1.14%	1.21%	1.36%	0.82%	0.92%	1.42%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIM and NTSX in my portfolio?

DIM and NTSX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIM or NTSX?

NTSX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to DIM (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIM dropped -61.45% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, DIM or NTSX?

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 8.85% vs 8.50% for DIM. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DIM has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIM or NTSX?

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIM or NTSX?

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DIM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIM or NTSX?

DIM has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.10% for NTSX.

What is the main difference between DIM and NTSX?

DIM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DIM and 0.20% for NTSX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.