PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIM vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIM vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIM achieves a 6.96% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 8.62% return.


DIM

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.84%
YTD
6.96%
6M
9.54%
1Y
20.14%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
7.90%

NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIM vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DIM
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund
6.96%37.25%3.51%15.00%-14.09%9.55%-0.40%19.85%-12.93%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.62%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DIM and NTSX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.70

The correlation between DIM and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIM vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIM
NTSX

Financial Services

25.0%
12.3%

Industrials

21.5%
7.7%

Real Estate

7.9%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
10.1%

Utilities

7.6%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
5.5%

Basic Materials

5.6%
1.4%

Communication Services

5.5%
12.5%

Energy

5.2%
3.5%

Healthcare

3.8%
8.4%

Technology

3.7%
35.1%

Financial Services

DIM
25.0%
NTSX
12.3%

Industrials

DIM
21.5%
NTSX
7.7%

Real Estate

DIM
7.9%
NTSX
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DIM
7.8%
NTSX
10.1%

Utilities

DIM
7.6%
NTSX
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

DIM
6.4%
NTSX
5.5%

Basic Materials

DIM
5.6%
NTSX
1.4%

Communication Services

DIM
5.5%
NTSX
12.5%

Energy

DIM
5.2%
NTSX
3.5%

Healthcare

DIM
3.8%
NTSX
8.4%

Technology

DIM
3.7%
NTSX
35.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIM vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIM
DIM Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIM vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIMNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.77

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.26

12.25

-5.00

DIM vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIM and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIMNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.06

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.57

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.71

-0.41

Drawdowns

DIM vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIM drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIM and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIMNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.45%

-31.34%

-30.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-9.16%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

-16.82%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.71%

-31.34%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-1.05%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.63%

-6.79%

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.07%

+0.71%

Volatility

DIM vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund (DIM) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.39%. This indicates that DIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIMNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

3.39%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

9.58%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

12.31%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.43%

17.04%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

18.27%

-1.36%

DIM vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIM has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIM vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIM
WisdomTree International MidCap Dividend Fund
2.85%3.20%3.58%4.62%3.96%3.65%2.53%3.26%3.28%2.57%2.94%2.81%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIM and NTSX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIM has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIM dropped -61.45% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.69% vs 8.04% for DIM. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DIM.

DIM has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

DIM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DIM and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIM and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer