PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIHP vs. IDOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIHP vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIHP achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 14.02% return.


DIHP

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.71%
YTD
8.04%
6M
9.40%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
10Y*

IDOG

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.24%
YTD
14.02%
6M
16.64%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIHP vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DIHP
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF
8.04%28.26%0.50%19.07%-10.88%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.02%39.94%1.35%23.57%-5.86%

Correlation

The correlation between DIHP and IDOG is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.86

The correlation between DIHP and IDOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIHP vs. IDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIHP
IDOG

Industrials

21.6%
11.7%

Technology

13.1%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
9.5%

Healthcare

11.1%
9.3%

Financial Services

10.6%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
9.4%

Basic Materials

7.7%
10.0%

Energy

6.0%
10.7%

Communication Services

5.9%
9.9%

Utilities

2.7%
10.0%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Industrials

DIHP
21.6%
IDOG
11.7%

Technology

DIHP
13.1%
IDOG
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DIHP
11.4%
IDOG
9.5%

Healthcare

DIHP
11.1%
IDOG
9.3%

Financial Services

DIHP
10.6%
IDOG
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

DIHP
9.1%
IDOG
9.4%

Basic Materials

DIHP
7.7%
IDOG
10.0%

Energy

DIHP
6.0%
IDOG
10.7%

Communication Services

DIHP
5.9%
IDOG
9.9%

Utilities

DIHP
2.7%
IDOG
10.0%

Real Estate

DIHP
0.4%
IDOG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIHP vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIHP
DIHP Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DIHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIHP Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DIHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIHP Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIHP vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIHPIDOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

5.51

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.42

19.31

-12.90

DIHP vs. IDOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the IDOG Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIHP and IDOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIHPIDOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.68

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.51

+0.09

Drawdowns

DIHP vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIHP drawdown since its inception was -24.94%, smaller than the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIHP and IDOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIHPIDOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.94%

-37.32%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-6.47%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.42%

-13.92%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-0.47%

-2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-7.93%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

1.84%

+1.14%

Volatility

DIHP vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International High Profitability ETF (DIHP) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIHPIDOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

4.13%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

10.09%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

13.33%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

15.61%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

17.45%

-1.20%

DIHP vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIHP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIHP vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison

DIHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than IDOG's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIHP
Dimensional International High Profitability ETF
2.02%2.02%2.30%2.17%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.42%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIHP and IDOG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIHP has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to IDOG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIHP dropped -24.94% vs IDOG's -37.32%.

On 3-year performance, IDOG leads with 21.96% vs 14.52% for DIHP. On fees, DIHP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 21.96% return vs 14.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIHP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.02% for DIHP.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DIHP and 0.50% for IDOG.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIHP and IDOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer