DIG vs. NEMG
DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DIG is passively managed, while NEMG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. DIG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.
Performance
DIG vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIG achieves a 55.77% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's -28.76% return.
DIG
- 1D
- 5.98%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 45.87%
- YTD
- 55.77%
- 1Y
- 55.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 30.73%
- 10Y*
- 3.74%
NEMG
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -15.30%
- 6M
- -43.92%
- YTD
- -28.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 55.77% | -5.07% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | -28.76% | 22.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIG and NEMG is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIG vs. NEMG — Risk / Return Rank
DIG
NEMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIG vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIG | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIG vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIG drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, which is greater than NEMG's maximum drawdown of -58.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIG and NEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIG | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.04% | -58.31% | -38.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.37% | -58.31% | +3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.31% | -25.88% | -38.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.38% | — | — |
Volatility
DIG vs. NEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIG | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.08% | 100.38% | -58.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.49% | 100.38% | -48.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.81% | 100.38% | -42.57% |
DIG vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIG vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison
DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.59% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIG and NEMG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.
DIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DIG and 0.75% for NEMG.
Find the right allocation for DIG and NEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer