PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIEM vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIEM vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 24.14% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, DIEM has outperformed UUP with an annualized return of 8.30%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.17% annualized return.


DIEM

1D
-3.35%
1M
-4.04%
6M
18.80%
YTD
24.14%
1Y
41.33%
3Y*
23.75%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
8.30%

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIEM vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
24.14%30.81%12.29%15.41%-20.61%6.92%1.27%12.23%-11.29%27.61%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DIEM and UUP is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

-0.35

The correlation between DIEM and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.47 (5 years) to -0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIEM vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIEM vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIEMUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.28

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

6.26

+5.62

DIEM vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIEM and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIEM vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIEMUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-22.19%

-16.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-3.65%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-10.05%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

-10.37%

-22.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.61%

-14.24%

-24.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.15%

-1.26%

-7.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-8.88%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

1.33%

+2.16%

Volatility

DIEM vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that DIEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIEMUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.87%

1.45%

+9.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.32%

4.34%

+15.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.96%

6.03%

+15.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

7.22%

+10.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

6.90%

+11.10%

DIEM vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIEM vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.99%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIEM and UUP have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIEM has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 10-year performance, DIEM leads with 8.30% vs 3.17% for UUP. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 8.30% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 2.99% for DIEM.

DIEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while UUP is Currency. DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.75% for UUP.

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIEM and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer